<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>DevForce Community Forum : Create vs Construct</title>
  <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; DevForce Community Forum : DevForce 2009 : Create vs Construct</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:40:21 -700</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:32:45 -700</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.69</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.ideablade.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1132</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Create vs Construct : DevForce EF allows entity creation...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1132&amp;PID=4052#4052</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11" rel="nofollow">kimj</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1132<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12-Mar-2009 at 4:32pm<br /><br />DevForce EF allows entity creation via a standard constructor, which DevForce Classic does not allow, so the static Create factory methods defined in each entity were one way of highlighting the issue.&nbsp; In DevForce EF, "new"ing an Entity is allowed, and we're also more enthusiastic about using the Repository and other pertinent patterns.&nbsp;&nbsp; Our intention really isn't to force you into any pattern.&nbsp;&nbsp; Overloaded constructors work fine in DevForce EF, just be sure that you call AddToManager to make the new entity part of an EntityManager cache.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:32:45 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1132&amp;PID=4052#4052</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Create vs Construct : Hi,  Just wondering what your...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1132&amp;PID=4028#4028</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=452" rel="nofollow">ken.nelson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1132<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 11-Mar-2009 at 4:21am<br /><br />Hi,<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Just wondering what your current thoughts are regarding constructor overloading versus using static create methods.&nbsp; If I recall right, in DevForce classic, using static create methods was the preferred way and was explicitly noted as such.&nbsp; However, in DevForce EF I'm not seeing any specific information regarding this.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>The problem I always had with using static Create methods was that it made it impossible to use object initializers, so I'd prefer to overload constructors, but is there a reason why this might be a bad idea with DevForceEF?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Thanks,</DIV><DIV>Ken</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:21:51 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1132&amp;PID=4028#4028</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>