<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>DevForce Community Forum : Different transport protocol</title>
  <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; DevForce Community Forum : DevForce 2010 : Different transport protocol</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 09:56:39 -700</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:23:43 -700</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.69</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.ideablade.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3265</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Different transport protocol : That&amp;#039;s great that you&amp;#039;re...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12671#12671</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11" rel="nofollow">kimj</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3265<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15-Feb-2012 at 10:23am<br /><br />That's great that you're seeing good performance with your v1 release!&nbsp; <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We have looked at JSON,&nbsp;specifically JSON.NET since it handles object graphs with cyclic references.&nbsp; Part of the issue with our message payload is that the query expressions we serialize to the server are very, very complex; returned results usually less so, depending on the data retrieved.&nbsp; In general, though, streamlining the payload is the first step, and will make using other serializers easier. </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>If you get a chance to try protobuf-net, let us know how it turns out.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:23:43 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12671#12671</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Different transport protocol :    I checked around and protobuf-net...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12670#12670</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1264" rel="nofollow">katit</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3265<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15-Feb-2012 at 9:02am<br /><br />I checked around and protobuf-net still in beta also many people are using it already. There is some attempts (also I didn't find any solid examples) on replacing DataContractSerializer with protobuf. So, there is definitely some work in this area. One thing for sure - just config won't work as protobuf requires custom attributes on serialized objects.<div>&nbsp;</div><div>In your case you can even try JSON - there is built-in serializer already and performance/payload much better than of XML</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Will try it with my own&nbsp;REST services first and if works will try your suggestion on changing configuration.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>I just released v1 of my app with Silverlight and was surprised how fast it is working online (not intranet). I can just imaging how it is going to be with smaller payload.</div><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by katit - 15-Feb-2012 at 9:12am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:02:38 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12670#12670</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Different transport protocol : Hi katit,  We haven&amp;#039;t yet...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12669#12669</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=11" rel="nofollow">kimj</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3265<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15-Feb-2012 at 8:47am<br /><br />Hi katit,<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>We haven't yet looked at using Google Protocol Buffers.&nbsp; DevForce communications are built on a WCF stack, so we'd want to use something like protobuf-net or build some custom serializers and behaviors of our own to use protobuf.&nbsp;&nbsp; DevForce currently uses the DataContractSerializer and a custom message encoder to compress binary data, but we are aware of the size of messages and that there's certainly room for optimization.&nbsp; </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Since the WCF stack can be customized in DevForce via configuration or code, you might be able to use protobuf-net today.&nbsp; It would require specifying&nbsp;the binding and behaviors wanted to turn off DevForce defaults, and&nbsp;also possibly&nbsp;additional attribute markup with&nbsp;either&nbsp;Code First&nbsp;or customized T4 templates.&nbsp; It would require some work, but could be worth it.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Thanks for the suggestion.&nbsp; Since we're moving to more fully support a broader array of client types, we are also looking at how to use more lightweight communications.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:47:27 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12669#12669</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Different transport protocol :   This is half question and...</title>
   <link>http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12666#12666</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.ideablade.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1264" rel="nofollow">katit</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3265<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 14-Feb-2012 at 6:48pm<br /><br />This is half question and half suggestion<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Since you released Fiddler plug in I looked around on how data transferred from client to server and back.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Have you thought about using google's protobuf for this? It would be faster than XML and payload will be much smaller.</div><div>Maybe as an option?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Thanks!</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:48:42 -700</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3265&amp;PID=12666#12666</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>