DevForce Community Forum : Security http://www.ideablade.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; DevForce Community Forum : DevForce Classic : Security Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:05:11 -700 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:44:44 -700 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.69 360 www.ideablade.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=402 DevForce Community Forum http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_images/IdeaBlade_logo_tm.png http://www.ideablade.com/forum/ Security : I like your idea, but it is too... http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=402&PID=1069#1069 Author: davidklitzke
Subject: 402
Posted: 04-Sep-2007 at 10:44pm

I like your idea, but it is too high level to implement as as an IdeaBlade interface.  Rather, I see where a company coulkd develop a library routine to do this, taking into account error handling, type of encryption, , disconnected options, etc.
 
I like the idea that a company would make it a standard for developing all of their applications.
 
]]> Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:44:44 -700 http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=402&PID=1069#1069 Security : I was working through some of... http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=402&PID=1047#1047 Author: dwdcatalyst
Subject: 402
Posted: 03-Sep-2007 at 10:15am

I was working through some of the tutorial on disconnected apps and saw that there was a section on data security there.
 
I was just wondering, with all of the high-profile stories re: people losing their laptops with the entire corporate database loaded on it, wouldn't it
make sense to --automatically-- encrypt the data cache?
 
Using isolated storage would also make sense.
 
Why give individual developers the opportunity to make a serious mistake?  Plus, it'd seem to be a very good selling point for the product.
 
]]> Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:15:43 -700 http://www.ideablade.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=402&PID=1047#1047